Device Size Comparison
Weight
The Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra is 565g heavier than the iPhone 16e (338.3%).
Height
The Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra is 179.7mm taller than the iPhone 16e.
Width
The Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra is 137.1mm wider than the iPhone 16e.
Thickness
The iPhone 16e is 2.3mm thicker than the Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra.
Smaller body
iPhone 16e
iPhone 16e (71.5 × 146.7 mm) vs Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra (208.6 × 326.4 mm).
Lighter weight
iPhone 16e
iPhone 16e (167 g) vs Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra (732 g), 565 g lighter.
Thinner design
Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra (5.5 mm) vs iPhone 16e (7.8 mm).
Pocketability
iPhone 16e
iPhone 16e has a smaller overall body size for pocket carry (71.5 × 146.7 × 7.8 mm).
Larger overall size
Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra
Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra is 137.1 mm wider and 179.7 mm taller than iPhone 16e (208.6 × 326.4 mm vs 71.5 × 146.7 mm).
| Dimension | Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra | iPhone 16e | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Width | 208.6 mm | 71.5 mm | -137.1 mm |
| Height | 326.4 mm | 146.7 mm | -179.7 mm |
| Thickness | 5.5 mm | 7.8 mm | +2.3 mm |
| Weight | 732 g | 167 g | -565 g |
Pocket Carry
The iPhone 16e is the better pocket fit on paper; the Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra may feel tighter when stored vertically in shallow pockets.
One-Hand Use
The iPhone 16e's shorter body may reduce vertical thumb travel; the Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra covers more height when reaching the top of the screen.
Daily Comfort
Listed weight and bulk move together here: the Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra is both heavier and larger, which can feel more substantial during routine handheld use.
Travel & Bag Carry
The Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra uses more organizer space in a bag or backpack; the iPhone 16e leaves more room beside cases and chargers, and the Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra adds more listed mass to a packed carry.
Who should choose the Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra?
Choose the Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra if thinner 5.5 mm profile (vs 7.8 mm) matter most to you, even though it also has higher listed weight (732g vs 167g), wider 208.6 mm body (vs 71.5 mm), taller 326.4 mm frame (vs 146.7 mm), and larger overall footprint (208.6 × 326.4 mm vs 71.5 × 146.7 mm) compared with the iPhone 16e.
Who should choose the iPhone 16e?
Choose the iPhone 16e if lighter listed weight (167g vs 732g), narrower 71.5 mm width (vs 208.6 mm), shorter 146.7 mm height (vs 326.4 mm), and smaller width × height footprint (71.5 × 146.7 mm vs 208.6 × 326.4 mm) matter most to you, even though it also has thicker 7.8 mm edge (vs 5.5 mm) compared with the Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra.
Overall recommendation
Overall, the iPhone 16e is the more compact pick on listed size, and the Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra is the larger option for buyers who want more physical presence from the official dimensions alone.
More size comparisons from the same device families, brands, and recent flagship models.
Open Galaxy Tab S9 Ultra and iPhone 16e in the comparison tool