Device Size Comparison
Height
The iPhone 17 is 64.5mm taller than the Galaxy Z Flip6.
Thickness
The Galaxy Z Flip6 is 7mm thicker than the iPhone 17.
Weight
The Galaxy Z Flip6 is 10g heavier than the iPhone 17 (5.6%).
Width
The Galaxy Z Flip6 is 0.4mm wider than the iPhone 17.
Smaller body
Galaxy Z Flip6
Galaxy Z Flip6 (71.9 × 85.1 mm) vs iPhone 17 (71.5 × 149.6 mm).
Lighter weight
iPhone 17
iPhone 17 (177 g) vs Galaxy Z Flip6 (187 g), 10 g lighter.
Thinner design
iPhone 17
iPhone 17 (7.95 mm) vs Galaxy Z Flip6 (14.9 mm).
Pocketability
iPhone 17
iPhone 17 has a smaller overall body size for pocket carry (71.5 × 149.6 × 7.95 mm).
Larger overall size
iPhone 17
iPhone 17 is 0.4 mm wider and 64.5 mm taller than Galaxy Z Flip6 (71.5 × 149.6 mm vs 71.9 × 85.1 mm).
| Dimension | Galaxy Z Flip6 | iPhone 17 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Width | 71.9 mm | 71.5 mm | -0.4 mm |
| Height | 85.1 mm | 149.6 mm | +64.5 mm |
| Thickness | 14.9 mm | 7.95 mm | -6.95 mm |
| Weight | 187 g | 177 g | -10 g |
Pocket Carry
The iPhone 17's slimmer edge may slide into jeans or jacket pockets more easily, and the iPhone 17 has the smaller listed frame for upright storage.
One-Hand Use
The Galaxy Z Flip6's shorter body may reduce vertical thumb travel; the iPhone 17 covers more height when reaching the top of the screen.
Daily Comfort
Listed weight and bulk move together here: the Galaxy Z Flip6 is both heavier and larger, which can feel more substantial during routine handheld use.
Travel & Bag Carry
The iPhone 17 uses more organizer space in a bag or backpack; the Galaxy Z Flip6 leaves more room beside cases and chargers.
Who should choose the Galaxy Z Flip6?
Choose the Galaxy Z Flip6 if shorter 85.1 mm height (vs 149.6 mm) and smaller width × height footprint (71.9 × 85.1 mm vs 71.5 × 149.6 mm) matter most to you, even though it also has higher listed weight (187g vs 177g), wider 71.9 mm body (vs 71.5 mm), and thicker 14.9 mm edge (vs 7.95 mm) compared with the iPhone 17.
Who should choose the iPhone 17?
Choose the iPhone 17 if lighter listed weight (177g vs 187g), narrower 71.5 mm width (vs 71.9 mm), and thinner 7.95 mm profile (vs 14.9 mm) matter most to you, even though it also has taller 149.6 mm frame (vs 85.1 mm) and larger overall footprint (71.5 × 149.6 mm vs 71.9 × 85.1 mm) compared with the Galaxy Z Flip6.
Overall recommendation
Overall, the iPhone 17 is the more compact pick on listed size, and the Galaxy Z Flip6 is the larger option for buyers who want more physical presence from the official dimensions alone.
More size comparisons from the same device families, brands, and recent flagship models.