Device Size Comparison
Weight
The Galaxy Z TriFold is 110g heavier than the iPhone 16 Pro (55.3%).
Height
The Galaxy Z TriFold is 9.6mm taller than the iPhone 16 Pro.
Thickness
The Galaxy Z TriFold is 4.7mm thicker than the iPhone 16 Pro.
Width
The Galaxy Z TriFold is 3.5mm wider than the iPhone 16 Pro.
Smaller body
iPhone 16 Pro
iPhone 16 Pro (71.5 × 149.6 mm) vs Galaxy Z TriFold (75 × 159.2 mm).
Lighter weight
iPhone 16 Pro
iPhone 16 Pro (199 g) vs Galaxy Z TriFold (309 g), 110 g lighter.
Thinner design
iPhone 16 Pro
iPhone 16 Pro (8.25 mm) vs Galaxy Z TriFold (12.9 mm).
Pocketability
iPhone 16 Pro
iPhone 16 Pro has a smaller overall body size for pocket carry (71.5 × 149.6 × 8.25 mm).
Larger overall size
Galaxy Z TriFold
Galaxy Z TriFold is 3.5 mm wider and 9.6 mm taller than iPhone 16 Pro (75 × 159.2 mm vs 71.5 × 149.6 mm).
| Dimension | Galaxy Z TriFold | iPhone 16 Pro | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Width | 75 mm | 71.5 mm | -3.5 mm |
| Height | 159.2 mm | 149.6 mm | -9.6 mm |
| Thickness | 12.9 mm | 8.25 mm | -4.65 mm |
| Weight | 309 g | 199 g | -110 g |
Pocket Carry
The iPhone 16 Pro's slimmer edge may slide into jeans or jacket pockets more easily, and the iPhone 16 Pro has the smaller listed frame for upright storage.
One-Hand Use
The iPhone 16 Pro's shorter body may reduce vertical thumb travel; the Galaxy Z TriFold covers more height when reaching the top of the screen.
Daily Comfort
Listed weight and bulk move together here: the Galaxy Z TriFold is both heavier and larger, which can feel more substantial during routine handheld use.
Travel & Bag Carry
The Galaxy Z TriFold uses more organizer space in a bag or backpack; the iPhone 16 Pro leaves more room beside cases and chargers, and the Galaxy Z TriFold adds more listed mass to a packed carry.
Who should choose the Galaxy Z TriFold?
Choose the Galaxy Z TriFold if you prefer the larger listed body with higher listed weight (309g vs 199g), wider 75 mm body (vs 71.5 mm), taller 159.2 mm frame (vs 149.6 mm), thicker 12.9 mm edge (vs 8.25 mm), and larger overall footprint (75 × 159.2 mm vs 71.5 × 149.6 mm).
Who should choose the iPhone 16 Pro?
Choose the iPhone 16 Pro if you want the more compact listed option with lighter listed weight (199g vs 309g), narrower 71.5 mm width (vs 75 mm), shorter 149.6 mm height (vs 159.2 mm), thinner 8.25 mm profile (vs 12.9 mm), and smaller width × height footprint (71.5 × 149.6 mm vs 75 × 159.2 mm).
Overall recommendation
Overall, the iPhone 16 Pro is the more compact pick on listed size, and the Galaxy Z TriFold is the larger option for buyers who want more physical presence from the official dimensions alone.
More size comparisons from the same device families, brands, and recent flagship models.
Open Galaxy Z TriFold and iPhone 16 Pro in the comparison tool